Colorado has conflicting constitutional amendments regarding state revenue and spending. The Taxpayer's Bill of Rights (TABOR) restricts state spending to population growth plus inflation, while amendment 23 forces the state to spend increase spending on K-12 education even during an economic downturn. Throw in the spending lobby's desire to make the $6 billion "TABOR timeout," commonly known as Referendum C, permanent and its obvious the state faces a constitutional conundrum. Some legislators would like to "fix" TABOR rather than address spending. So we ask the question, what has TABOR meant to Colorado and how should the state address the constitutional conflict? Independent Thinking host Jon Caldara moderates a spirited dialogue between the University of Colorado Denver's Dr. Paul Teske and former state Senate President John Andrews.